| 
 
                  
  
              Zaibatsu and Keiretsu - Understanding 
                Japanese Enterprise Groups
 
 Anybody 
              who is familiar with Japan will recognize the words zaibatsu and 
              keiretsu. Few, however, know of their meaning and historical significance. 
              This is the first of several articles that will explain the origin, 
              historical significance and the current circumstances of Japans 
              enterprise groups, all of which we loosely tend to refer to as zaibatsu 
              and keiretsu. 
 This initial article explains the origins of the zaibatsu.
 
 Zaibatsu Formation in the Meiji Era (1868  1912)
 
 Zaibatsu generally refers to the large pre-WWII clusterings of Japanese 
              enterprises, which controlled diverse business sectors in the Japanese 
              economy. They were typically controlled by a singular holding company 
              structure and owned by families and/or clans of wealthy Japanese. 
              The zaibatsu exercised control via parent companies, which directed 
              subsidiaries that enjoyed oligopolistic positions in the pre-WWII 
              Japanese market. These economic groupings crystallized in the last 
              quarter of the 19th century during the Meiji Reformation.
 
 Zaibatsu first became a popular term among management and economics 
              experts when the term appeared in the book History of Financial 
              Power in Japan (Nihon Kinken Shi) as published late in the Meiji 
              Era. Even in Japan, the term was not commonly used until the mass 
              media adopted it in the late 1920s.
 
 The zaibatsu were formed from the Meiji governments policies 
              of state entrepreneurialism, which characterized the modernization 
              of the economy during that era. To understand the significance of 
              zaibatsu, one must consider at the onset of the Meiji era, agriculture 
              comprised 70% of Japans national production, and approximately 
              three quarters of Japan worked in farming related jobs. The government 
              used land tax revenues to fund the state planning, building and 
              financing of industries determined by bureaucrats to be necessary 
              for Japans economic development. Meiji bureaucrats did not 
              rely on the free market in reforming the economy, but they also 
              did not develop the economy alone.
 
 In the 1880s the Meiji government sold some government-owned 
              enterprises on special terms to a chosen financial oligarchy implicitly 
              entrusted with the public interest in developing the national economy. 
              These enterprises were entrusted to the influential concerns known 
              as the Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Yasuda, Okura and Asano groups.
 
 These private parties and enterprises crystallized over time into 
              large, integrated complexes steered by the government bureaucrats 
              into areas of development desired for the reformation of Japan. 
              To secure compliance, the government provided inducements such as 
              exclusive licenses, capital funding, and other privileges. Although 
              Japan badly needed foreign technology, know-how and capital, the 
              government adopted a policy of shutting out foreign entrepreneurs 
              with few exceptions in favor of domestic development.
 
 After WWI, when Japans economy made huge strides in economic 
              reformation, the zaibatsu interests began to enter the political 
              arena to support their interests. Their activities became entwined 
              with the government in wartime Japan. Eventually, the Potsdam Declaration 
              that was signed in 1945 required the liquidation of the zaibatsu 
              as one step to democratize Japans post-war economy.
 
 Zaibatsu Control Structures
 
 Unlike the current situation in Japan, it is said that the zaibatsu 
              stockholders were relatively strong. While zaibatsu holding companies 
              directed the enterprise complexes in a pyramid fashion, stockholding 
              relations cemented together the companies within zaibatsu complexes. 
              Characteristics of the complexes included holdings by members of 
              more than half of the holding companys stock, and the position 
              of the holding company as the overwhelmingly largest shareholder 
              of companies within the complex. The stock of members was rarely 
              sold by other members to third parties. Under this structure, zaibatsu 
              and their leading holding companies drove the finance, heavy industry 
              and shipping sectors that forged the heart of Japans economy.
 
 By the 1920s zaibatsu economic power engulfed the sectors 
              of finance, trading and many major large-scale industries. From 
              1914 to 1929, three zaibatsu (Mitsui, Mitsubishi and Sumitomo) controlled 
              28% of the total assets of the top 100 Japanese companies. Even 
              as of 1945, the same complexes possessed 22.9% of the total assets 
              of all Japanese stock companies.
 
 As will be explained in Part II of this series, subsequent to the 
              liquidation of the zaibatsu pursuant to the Potsdam Declaration, 
              new enterprise complexes and groups that resembled the zaibatsu 
              were resurrected in Japan. There are, however, significant differences 
              that distinguish the zaibatsu from the modern keiretsu. These differences 
              and the subsequent formation of the keiretsu will be discussed in 
              later articles.
 
 Andrew H. Thorsen serves as a Partner in the Tokyo Office of 
              Dorsey & Whitney LLP, a U.S. law firm. The views of the author 
              are not necessarily the views of the firm of Dorsey & Whitney 
              LLP, and the author is solely and individually responsible for the 
              content above.
 
               
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
             
 
 
 
   |